12 angry men opinion essay
12 angry men essay
In the American criminal system, those charged with crimes need to be proven guilty 'beyond a reasonable doubt. After court when all of the men sat down to begin their discussion Courtney B. Vance 1 Took charge and respectfully was now the leader. Three of the most influential members include juror 3, juror 10, and juror A major conflict that is very obvious is the disagreement on whether the young boy was guilty or innocent. The premise is the trial of a frightened, teenaged defendant accused of stabbing and killing his father. Rose demonstrates this though the jury, a microcosm representation of a cross-section of America, who works together to form a just, unanimous decision. This play was made into a movie in , produced by Henry Fonda who played the lead role, Juror 8, and Reginald Rose who wrote the original screenplay The vote is 11 to 1 in a murder trial of a year-old boy charged with stabbing and killing his father.
Fonda, G. In the Casey Anthony trial, Anthony was a suspect in the murder of her daughter Caylee. The jury selection is where issue number one arises.
This movie shows why critical thinking is important for work, business, family and any are of the human being. On a dramatic level, Act I ends with a very exciting moment that would serve to make a powerful end to the first act, right before an intermission.
?12 angry men? study guide answers
He was continually bringing up more evidence that which lead to more conflicts. The movie tugged into strings that in the course of watching the movie, or even after, continuously made me think. In the film 12 Angry Men, many of the pros and cons of group communication are highlighted. The movie is about a jury of twelve men deciding whether a boy will go to the death penalty or go out the doors a free man. Of course, absolutism in either direction is not wise, and, in almost any case, moderation will find better results, especially in a court room. It is safe to say that our actions, beliefs, and choices separate us from animals and non-livings. A weary judge discusses with the jury and informs that they must decide wether or not the boy is guilty of his crime, he also informs that should they find him guilty, he will be sentenced to death. Likewise, the 3rd is forced to recognise the degree to which his personal vendetta interfered with the decision-making process. This man is juror number 8 played by Henry Fonda. If the jurors decide that the year-old is guilty of murder than he will be sent to the electric chair and there is no other form of punishment.
The jurors are then locked into a small room on a hot summer day. One of the initial questions that was proposed after the jurors began deliberations was a conversation that juror 2 and 3 initially had in the beginning of the film.
According to research conducted by Irving Janis, there are three conditions to groupthink The purpose of this paper is to analyze the importance of cooperative communities while providing different aspects of leadership. Juror 9, the oldest gentleman in the group, agrees that they jury should review the evidence and be sure without a reasonable doubt the defendant is guilty Any type of essay.
12 angry men character analysis
The movie is about a jury of twelve men deciding whether a boy will go to the death penalty or go out the doors a free man. Not very much. In the film, twelve men are brought together in a room to decide whether a boy is guilty of killing his father. According to research conducted by Irving Janis, there are three conditions to groupthink On a practical level, the Foreman is charged with moderating their discussion and taking regular polls as to the judgment of the jurors. When facts become secondary to perception, challenges arise. The jurors go back to their private room to further discuss the case. In life, it is true, the young and innocent seem to touch more lives around us than anyone else.
based on 31 review